TIME

TIME

AND DIMENSIONS

Most who r= ead this chapter will find the ideas here particularly confronting. Lets just say it’s part a framework that attempts to describe what is a very complex universe and especially where the idea of three dimensional space sits within this structure. Its no doubt many questions will arise from the material present= ed here however its clear that these concepts are far from what would be considered in general mainstream physics as common sense. Reality, it’= ;s said, is stranger than fiction and I feel this chapter represents an honest attem= pt – a start you might say – at a “conscious understanding” of our greater universe.

Space is multi-dimensioned containing many more than the three dimensions we current= ly observe through our own eyes. Let us start with the idea that there are four dimensions in our universe. L= et us suppose then that our entire universe - only four dimensions at this stage = - is a big sphere or hyper-sphere of just four dimensions. Its surface can be regarded as a sub-space of three dimensions: this is our space – the space we can see. We only feel, think and see in these three dimensions bec= ause our brain has been built with hardware only capable of working in three dimensions: you could say our brain is wired for three dimensions only. Knowing this and understanding our limitations of a three dimensional existence we will now attempt to formula= te rules as a way of describing this landscape of four dimensions:<= /span>

There exis= ts a single large four-dimensioned hyper-sphere.

At this st= age we shall say it represents our entire universe. Its surface is the three dimensional sub-space we huma= ns know and understand. Three-dimensional space here can be thought of as just= a single layer on the outside of this hyper-sphere and is made up of Eterons. Although Eterons have more than three dimensions, they are restricted to mo= ve, at this time to just three dimensions. The four-dimensioned surface where t= his three-dimensioned layer exists I shall label the ‘hyper-platform̵= 7;. It is the foundation of our known three-dimensional space.

Whilst we = will be examining one single layer out from the hyper-centre there also probably exists consecutive layers that represent other different three-dimensional = areas. That to move in towards the hyper = centre means to move into another three-dimensional realm: the “inner zone”. From our 3D surf= ace successive layers (outwards from the centre) are being generated and it is = the “outer zone”. In = other words, the succession of layers is the same as the succession of “3d-space-slides”.

Betw= een the inner (lower) zone and the outer (upper) zone our 3d space is “pressed” and each Eteron is held inside the three dimensional sub-space by some kind of force-field allowing them to move free only in 3d.

Eterons are spherical particles having at least four-dimensions. In four-dimensions the ‘equator’ of the Eteron is the three-dimensioned surface of the four-dimensioned particle. That equator (a spherical surface for us) is mad= e up around the surface of sub-Eterons each with a dipole. Such equator-dipoles = are those mentioned in previous chapters as ‘weak dipoles’. Interac= tion amongst Eterons can happen only through the equator-dipoles. It is these th= at form a three-dimensional layer with a thickness of one Eteron as we observe them – the only part visible in the third dimension.

From the c= entre of the big hyper-sphere and rising through the hyper-platform, a flow of particles exists. I shall call this type of particle a ‘cronon’. Each particle possesses electrical polarity whilst still maintaining ……... If the cronons flowing are of negative polarity, then the flow turns all the Eteron equator-dipoles perpendicular to the hyper-platfo= rm with (for example) positive ends towards the hyper-centre.

Lets tackl= e this from another angle. If we extend the concept of force to 4 dimensions then given currently a force is represented by a 3d vector (with components xyz)= let us add another dimension (xyzv) and we can say xyz are the really the visib= le components. It means that a force in v can push an Eteron out of the 3d lay= er (to a position either above or below), while an Eteron with a position xyz = but with v equal to zero can only move within three dimensions (on the hyper-platform). In this way = we can say that cronons are generating forces with a v component on the eterons. However, the forces that generate the three dimensional layer are stronger. Now, a new question arises: if eterons repel each other at the equator, then what is the force that holds them in three dimensions? Its clear from this analysis that the universe is much more complex than we initially imagined.= The model of hyper-platform initially seems to work, however we find gaps ̵= 1; containment within this layer requires another force. So, we have to imagine another layer (that maybe passes through the equator of the eterons), on a hyper-sphere surface that has a cohesion-force with eterons. That is, this special layer must be made up of a special kind of sub-Eteron that serves to hold eterons within the three dimensions. Considering these circumstances cronons would therefore be a secondary force that, below a determined intensity, cannot break the mentioned 3d field however can rotate the sub-E= teron dipoles at the equator.

It was men= tioned above that cronons have either a positive or negative polarity. In truth it= far more likely they are instead a much more complex structure made up of sub-sub-eterons with their polarity having a structure something similar to that of the electron: assembled with equal amounts of sub-particles of both polarities, however with such a disposition that they generate unbalanced electrical fields. Moreover, that field would have a very short range enabling the cronon to have a dipole structure similar to eterons.

Equator-di= poles are not part of a polar thread (like in polar sheaves) because in this case they exist as lonely dipoles each one fixed to the Eteron at its equator. Th= e only range of motion is the rotation of the individual dipole axis. In these circumstances the Eterons have no opposed flow. All dipole-axes are oriente= d in the same direction and repel amongst themselves. These are the weak dipoles= of Eterons. Those repulsion forces create the barrier between Eterons. If a fo= rce is encountered by Eterons, their dipoles turn to face the force direction a= nd with opposed poles an attraction begins: the Eteron’s barrier has therefore been overcome. Then Eterons have become strongly linked between t= hemselves generating a force field in only 3 dimensions. Said field in this instance forces the Eterons to move only in three dimensions.

This= field is only added to that created by lower and upper realm.

      If a pair = of Eterons exchange polarized sub-Eterons, they become a pair of Eter-ions of opposed poles. The positive is pushed below the three-dimensional space whe= re the Eteron equator is situated and nearer to the hyper-platform’s cen= tre while the negative Eteron is pushed to the opposed (upper) side of the fore-mentioned three-dimensioned space. They will move in two different but adjacent spaces still in three dimensions but above and below the three dimensions we experience. They are also free to move in any direction paral= lel within three-dimensional space – that is, depending on direction of t= he sub electric current. So they must move adjacent to our three dimensions but only according to the direction the sub electric current is moving in.

      Pushing fo= rces exist due to cronons. So, Eter-ions do not cross Eterons, they do not crash into them. However observed by our three dimension eyes, they are like ghos= ts – passing through things. Nevertheless, electrical interactions here = are so strong such that if a current of Eter-ions were to move inside original three dimensioned space it would not be possible to insulate them without t= he use of polarized electrodes because they cross every neutral material slidi= ng in both parallel three dimension spaces (upper and lower).

      Cronons ar= e the ‘time-triggers’ of Eterons. They hit internal parts of Eterons = and trigger events. Cronon-flow has a determined value based on the amount per “surface-unit” (four dimensioned surface =3D three dimensioned volume). The density of cronons is directly proportional to the time-flowing-speed. An Eteron’s mass is proportional to its volume. M= ass is equal to the inverse of volume. If volume decreases, cronon-flow-density also decreases with regard to the Eteron and time expands. That is why a mo= re compressed Eteron lives ‘slower’.

       The = clock of an Eteron is as if there were balance-wheels inside. Each passing cronon hits one of them, adding one small-tick. Interval “t” of Eterons has a determined amount of small-ticks. A smaller Eteron (higher mass) need= s a longer time to complete that amount.

      The last explanation summarizes the relation between time, mass, speed, measurement = and all relativistic phenomenon. At this stage I can say it is by no means a perfect model however it does present an initial attempt at an end-to-end m= odel explaining activity within our Universe. If somebody has a better explanati= on I implore him or her to send me a copy.

      Extrapolat= ing the described ideas, and with an advanced technology it would be possible to build spacecrafts that actually travel by sliding into parallel adjacent sp= ace where velocities are far, far higher than can be attained inside normal 3d space, even with the used of the non-inertial drive process (see the chapte= r on FLYING CRAFTS). This is balan= ced by the very dangerous possibility that once out and into the hyper-sphere it possible to become hopelessly lost never able to return. With other words, “soaring” from the hyper-platform.

      Another interesting possibility is the existence of parallel “time-lines̶= 1;. There is only one time stream within a four dimensional hyper platform howe= ver consider the possibility of more than four dimensions. More than four dimensions can contain parallel lines of hyper-spheres generating parallel worlds where history is a little or alternatively very different. It is possible to imagine that the entire (local) universe is composed of static elements and the flow of time is the generation of a following universe in a perpendicular sense and with almost an equal amount of elements but differe= nces that mean one jump-ahead in time – much like a pile of slides. Moving perpendicular to each slide is moving in past time. So, present is the last slide. As soon as a new slide is created, it becomes the past. The step from one slide to the next is an absolute time unit. Between two consecutive sli= des there is no time, no duration; there is NOTHING. Then we can consider that = the ‘present-slide’ determines or generates the next slide. Now, if= we return to the past and take any slide, although we cannot alter it (the pas= t is forever) however we can use it as a ‘present-slide’ for one time unit and use it to open a new time-line.&n= bsp; The possibilities are extraordinary.

      A ‘f= ork of time’ is like a book that, at say chapter 4 continues with chapter 5a= and 5b. Each branch continues the story differently. Such a scenario would be t= hat I might return to the past and open a new branch creating a fork. In that n= ew branch I kill my grandfather, so in that fork I shall not be born later (but yes put in jail in that fork for the crime) and I continue living in a world where my father will not exist and I am an alien. Later (if I can escape fr= om the jail) I return to my original time where nothing happened because I was absent for only one time unit. If I return after many time units, people wi= ll say I was absent for an interval that will be also unalterable. Once an eve= nt has happened nothing can change it, but this analysis indicates it is possi= ble to open a new branch of events from any slide. Slides are the ‘memory= of existence’ in an n-dimensioned space. The ‘existence’ mentioned here has no limit for n. It has no imaginable limit.

      Now another possibility is a ‘time-chamber’. Increasing the cronon-flow-den= sity inside a chamber will result in matter living ‘faster’. The cha= mber would become very hot. If you need to study for an exam and had ‘no time’ then using one of these chambers would provide the time. On the contrary, decreasing cronon flow it’s possible to build a chamber to create ‘slow time’ resulting in it becoming very cool. Inside, clocks indicate just a few minutes while outside several days have passed. Time-chambers will become very useful once the process has been identified however at this stage its difficult to say how that process should be creat= ed.

      Digital ti= me is a concept worthwhile analysing. The first question to ask: what does exist between two consecutive time units? Nothing exists because if something did exist between two executive time units then the time units by definition wo= uld not be consecutive. The second question is: how many new units can be situated between two consecutive time units (turning them into ‘non-consecutive time units’)? There i= s no limit to what can be inserted however the concept of “nothing exists between two consecutive units” still remains valid. The number of existing units is finite. The concept of ‘infinite’ is not a manageable concept here. The conclusion is that time is digital. Analogue t= ime is something that it is possible to say with words; for example two times t= wo equals five. We cannot however say it is ‘infinite’ since it suggests that the ‘infinite is something’. Infinite is not something because it is more than any kind of ‘something’, so we can never reach the infinite – this is by definition. Thus we cannot = use it as a concept fitting it in amongst other finite concepts. So, for ALL practical applications= the ‘infinite’ does not exist. Time is a practical application of t= he Cosmos.

      The concep= t of the hyper-platform indicates a finite three-dimensional space. If all of sp= ace – our universe is a single large hyper-sphere – that is a large ball with the surface representing our three dimensional space, then if something moves in a determined direction within the universe it must retur= n to the starting place from the opposite direction after having travelled a full circle that passes by the antipode (the opposite side of a sphere) of said hyper-sphere.

      In such sp= ace, if galaxies expand with the expanding centre at a given point but in various opposite paths out form the starting point, they initially experience increasing distances between each path taken. Having moved 90 degrees of the mentioned circle distances cease to increase, continuing for a moment in pa= rallel. Later, they begin to approach each other converging at the antipode (the opposite side of the hyper sphere, that is juxta-positioned to the start po= int) of the initial expanding point. Chaotic movements due to gravity-interactio= ns will exist to avoid an exact “monster crash”. However there wou= ld be a high concentration of galaxies inside a very reduced volume of space. = The other phenomenon is a gravity convergence. At the beginning of a ‘big foom’ (not a word in the real sense but used here to describe not necessarily a boom but more a whoosh and to replace what they call the ‘big bang’) all galaxies start to emit gravitons at the speed of light, much faster than their own expanding velocity. In this situation then gravitons would reach the antipode of the hyper-sphere at a point significa= ntly before the galaxy that emitted them. This applies for all emitted gravitons from galaxies. There they wil= l be a convergence and concentration of gravitons at the antipode of the hyper-sphere such that neutrons are generated. Gravitons that have not built neutrons cross antipode and, again, diverge travelling back along the oppos= ite side of the hyper-sphere finally reaching the galaxy again but from the opposite side. Through out this return journey the gravitons continue to attract neutrons towards the original antipode however they are less in num= ber and energy than the gravitons that are converging, so the antipode converge= nt gravitons win with the resultant force being that of expanding just born neutrons, generating a new ‘big foom centre’ at the antipode and where neutrons become hydrogen – the same hydrogen that builds huge s= tars that explode causing heavier elements to be created. So, new galaxies are b= orn and expand. It means that expansion of galaxies is ever increasing. This is exactly what astronomers have observed: the red-shift of further galaxies is actually less that that of closer ones. If we suppose that the light of fur= ther galaxies started out from them at a time far further ago then the lower red= shift means a less expanding velocity at the age it was released (photon). So, fr= om nearer galaxies light started much later and their red shift is correspondi= ngly higher because something is accelerating them. According to the big-bang theory, said acceleration has no explanation. In the up coming chapter on GRAVITY I show another explanation for the red shift experienced. *

      Our univer= se is made up of many, many expanding points or galaxy-energy-packages all having their own antipodes on the other side of the hyper-sphere and such that the interactions that occur as gravitons stream towards their own antipode inte= ract with neutrons coming from other antipodes and again interacting. This process started much more sim= ply and through the continual emissions etc has grown complex One could say a really cosmic mess.

<= /span>      One given hyper-sphere may have more than one pair of such antipodes and several pair= s of galaxy-energy-packages can live bouncing between antipodes. If one galaxy looses matter, generating gravity, a new one is created but at the antipode= of the hyper-sphere. The concept of a ‘super-small’ particle or ‘universon’ exploding and generating all matter I consider ridiculous. (Universon here &= #8211; the single particle that created all of the matter and energy in our univer= se. It is a particle as in proton or neutron – having ‘on’ - = only that it generates a universe. It is a funny concept but used to comment the= “big-bang= ” theory).

     It would imply a quasi-infinite measurement-reduction and mass-increase of one particle. According to the Eteronic theory this is simply not possible as it is not possible for the existence of black holes. Both concepts are based on the unlimited compression of matter. Moreover, the theory of “universon” and that of black holes are in plain contradiction.= A particle like a universon must be by definition a monster black hole. Then = why has it exploded? A black hole has already finished exploding hasn’t i= t? Why?

      Current theoretical teaching states a black hole is a piece of matter so contracted that its liberation-speed is higher than the speed of light, then nothing (neither particles nor photons) can escape from it. With constant mass, liberation speed increases with the square root of the inverse of its radiu= s. Thus, decreasing it’s radius it’s liberation speed increases. Then tending the radius to an infinitesimal point results in the liberation speed tending to an infinite. Even a finite amount of matter like Earth must redu= ce to a diameter comparable to a single inch to reach that liberation speed. Such a contraction, according to Eteron-theory is possible if the minimum diameter of eterons is not reached. The concept of a particle able to generate a lot of galaxies being of a size smaller than a proton is not possible. Therefore according to the Eteron-th= eory black holes do not exist.

      Returning = to Eteronic bodies, in the core of a particle there are very compressed Eteron= s. It was stated earlier that cronon flow and the number of cronons govern the speed of time. For each Eteron then the fact of Eteronic compression result= s in a smaller area (in four dimensions) resulting in them actually having less cronons cross through them and as such, ‘time’ for these compre= ssed Eterons expands in proportion to its internal energy. Then the idea of oppo= sed flow advancing step by step has some problems. For an Eteron near to the ve= rtex of a cone its value of ‘t’ (time tick of an Eteron’s inte= rnal clock) is longer than for one at the surface of a particle.

      In a cone predominant forces are those that generate opposed flow. When an Eteron moves inwards the particle’s body along a cone, step by step its “t” interv= al lengthens. One step is the “t” value of the outermost Eteron. Later, when an Eteron is near to the middle of the cone, it is compressed more and more without finishing its “t”. It can travel several steps in elast= ic compression state. Its neighbour Eterons (in the adjacent bar of the cone) = have very similar “t” values. So entering as exiting eterons can tra= vel several steps without exchanging energy. Deeper inside the particle, amount= of steps increases to reach one exchanging event. Said exchanging happens simultaneously for a row of eterons. Amount of Eterons in each row is simil= ar to value of mass increment for each Eteron. Then, deeply inside the particl= e, energy exchange is by rows instead o being by solitary Eterons. Each row-exchange generates a shock-wave inside the particle’s body. These shock-waves do not disturb to the opposed flow whose forces are much higher. The sum of those waves maybe generates a moving surface, like water-waves, = and if we imagine the particle as a planet, it shows an interesting landscape: groups of mountains pointing up and sinking down alternatively. That waves = run on the surface and at a given moment a sum of maximums generates a node that throws out one Eteron. It must be a surface-Eteron whose compression state = is proportional to the particle’s mass. Then it develops into a wave: an Eteron in “a” state (without strong dipole) into a graviton and= an Eteron in “b”state (with strong dipole) into a photon. Last described phenomenon is the sontaneous emission. So gravity is generated. Photons travelling in space also have this emission and part of redshift is= due to it. Relation between emitt= ed energy and particle’s internal energy is constant and very high.

       Summarizing, it is possible to say that so gravity as photon’s lengthening is due to spontaneous emission that, at its time, is due to the time-mechanism of Eterons.

      The smalle= r the Eteron is the slower the Eteron’s ‘t’ becomes. Time within a particle travels slo= wer like the consecutive layers of an onion.&n= bsp; Consider an Eteron travelling within an inward bound cone towards the centre. At the surface of the particle ‘t’ is at a minimum. Step by step its ‘t’ b= ecomes longer in duration resulting in more and more long rows. A row of n Eterons interchanges energy with its opposed bar each n steps.

      Imagine a = cone where the lateral energy state transferring executes only after the complet= ion of the longest t (at or near to the vertex of a cone in the context of a particle). Seemingly, a problem wouldn’t exist under these conditions with regard to a particle. However, what about a photon? The core of a short photon has very compressed eterons and with a longer t. A longer t would fo= rce a delay at the surface and the speed of light (equal to the speed of the photon) would vary. In fact evidence indicates that this does not happen. In fact the ‘t’ at the particle’s surface MUST be the shorte= st t. For all systems its clear = that this model does not work.

      In a photo= n, all forces are in a single direction: that of the movement. The photon (as well= as a graviton) has a determined surface to sweep through. In all waves eterons within their path must change their energy (and dipole) state across the perturbation area continuously along the path. Every perturbation – w= ave – must travel at the speed of light. If eterons do not diminish diame= ter, there would be no problem. However the smaller the diameter of the wave particle’s core implies a longer ‘t’ and a delay in sweep= ing. According to this analysis a bulk of eterons would remain at the front. Suc= h a bulk generates a pressure and an Eteron-migration through the wave therefore must occur. To round out this concept, the amount of absorbed eterons at the front is equal to the amount thrown back.&= nbsp; The wave seen from a distance is a spherical moving bulk that ‘eats’ eterons at the front and leaves them back at the rear. We can say that it has an internal flow of eterons. Flow at the centre of the = wave is slower while closer to the surface it is correspondingly faster. The only thing to achieve is to move the same number of eterons at the front as at t= he rear. This process must be continuous and occurring at the speed of light, that is, d/t where ‘d’ is the diameter of eterons in neutral space and ‘t= 217; is at minimum duration – referring to Eterons at minimum energy: the Eteronic medium. A wave carries an Eteron for only a short distance, while a particle carries them for a very long distance. A particle will change all = of its eterons (by the opposed flow of cones) but it will do it over a much lo= nger distance.

       Acco= rding to the above mentioned model, so particles as waves advance in space absorb= ing Eterons of the medium at the front and emitting them at the rear. Then what= is the difference between waves and particles? Why the wave moves continuously= and the particle must generate a matter-wave and advance by cycles?= A wave only has longitudinal forces working within, while a particle has radial on= es. Observe that in the core of a wave a bigger amount of slower Eterons flow through a given section. Waves carry only part of the swallowed Eterons, wh= ile the particles carry so swallowed as theirs own Eterons.

      Given the response waves have to a changing duration of ‘t’ consider this added attribute as it applies to a particle. Unlike waves forces are radial (instead of linear); then not all the energy is orientated towards the direction of movement but only a small fraction of it. That is why a partic= le cannot reach the speed of light: it cannot generate a flow on the entire sweeping surface. Subsequently it has to generate a wave. The particle moves slower than light. But the wave seeks to move ahead with the speed of light= and the particle stops it. It then reverses it direction of travel crossing back across the particle seeking out the densest area to travel across – t= he particle’s core. This wave is of course the intron. Some conditions c= an generate a linear force-front, causing the particle becomes a wave for exam= ple when an electron and a positron meet and become a photon.=

      The oppose= d flow of cones has no problem. We imagine a cone moving one Eteron towards the centre. In fact each cone within a particle simultaneously changing the position of their respective eterons one position at a time. Simply each Et= eron has a different ‘t’ as long as it is near to the central sphere= , but said “t” works for energy exchange and NOT for moving inside the particle’s body. Direct moving of Eterons so that they do not vary compression or dipole state DO NOT depend on “t”. Upper limit of speed for this movement is far higher than that of light.



<= o:p>