THE EXPERIMENT

THE EXPERIMENT

<= o:p>

A theory s= uch as the one described in the previous chapters would be but an interesting stor= y if not for some hard evidence to back it up. This evidence is in the form of a= device capable of creating sub-electric currents and then displaying resulting reactions. Essentially what is required is a system that delivers 1.5Mv DC = to an object sitting inside a magnetic field - for simplicities sake the earth= 's magnetic field will be used initially. Consider the following diagram - Dia= gram 12.1.

<= o:p>

DIAGRAM 12.1

There are a number of ways to create this kind of voltage and below describes just one. Sections can be replaced with alternate assemblies producing the same outco= me however I did successfully produce the desired outcome using the following configuration.

The compon= ents are listed as follows:

1. Pulse Generator capable of producing around 20 Khertz.

2. 25 hori= zontal output tubes - 6DQ6 were the ones I used. (2a. Power supply of + 450 volts.= )

3. A resonant coil cap= able of delivering 100000 volts peak to peak at 20 Khertz.

4. Output = from the coil would be 100000V at 20 Khertz.

5. Two con= denser rails containing 15 multipliers.

6. Each ra= il consists of a thing 50= mm OD aluminium tube 12= 00 mm long.

7. Each ra= il is rolled with polyethylene sheeting 1900 mm wide to a thickness of 30 mm and then impreg= nated with oil in a vacuum.

8. A container capable= of housing all the components listed. It should be about 3 meters in height= and of plastic or polyethylene construction.

9. Coming = off the last tape on the condenser would be a wire carrying a 1.5 MV potential = to the aluminium sheet.

10. Normal= car oil - SAE40 type.

11. An EM or Electrified Mass - a bronze ball around 60 mm in diameter.

12. An alu= minium plate always at a potential of -1.5 Mv with regard to the surrounding environment.

Having lis= ted the major components lets discuss their characteristics and how they fit together.

Firstly th= ere are a number of sections to the device.&nb= sp; There is a (1) pulse generator capable of providing 20 KHz fed into = 25 horizontal output tubes (2) (I used the 6DQ6 type) of which the anodes are connected in parallel and are fed by 450 volts (2a). The circuit of anodes = are modulated in C class (maximum signal modulation). The 450 volts is the anode voltage (power source for the anodes). Modulating the tubes, the anode volt= age becomes alternating, of which the average direct voltage is + 450 volts.

The output= of this assembly is fed into a resonant coil (3) the secondary in which there appears an alternating voltage of 100000 volts peak to peak (4). This is the output of the second d= istinctive assembly. Note the primary is wound first. The nucleus contains a thick fer= rite core. Diameter is about 8 cm with 15 loops for the primary. The secondary around the primary has 1200 lo= ops and the external diameter is about 15 cm. It must be immersed in oil. I also= made a coil with the primary out and the secondary inside.

The active terminal of that secondary winding is then connected in parallel to 15 stag= es of voltage-doublers in cascade (5) and the result is 1.5 megavolts of continuous voltage at the other end.

The actual construction of the cascade is described below.

Each conde= nser consists of a thin pipe of aluminium 50 mm in diameter and exactly 1200 mm long (6). O= n each pipe is rolled a sheet of polyethylene 0.2 mm thick and 1900 mm wide up to = obtain a total of 30 mm in thickness around the tubing (7)

Plied to t= he outside of this polyethylene-covered tube are 15 tapes of aluminium exactly= 40 mm wide and placed= as bands. They are exactly 40 mm apart, applied = directly onto the exterior of the polyethylene layer. No air exists between the tape= and the polyethylene.

These 15 t= apes will cover a total length of 1200 mm. The remaining 700 mm - up side - is left free of alumin= ium tape and serves as a buffer due to the extreme high voltages experienced. (= Not represented on the diagram.)

The contai= ner (8) should be sufficiently high enough to contain both the two parallel condensers centered and a vertical spacing of more than 700 mm above for the= other items (these items need a minimum of 700 mm because of the tremendous voltages= that are being contained).

Recapping.= The two condensers are aligned parallel both with a length of 1900mm. The tapes on it sit at 40 mm apart and at th= e top of both there is a distance of 700 mm clear of tapes.&= nbsp; Add over 400mm in height from the top of the two condensers and this will be approximately the level to which the oil must be filled.

Dealing wi= th the diodes next - These are of a ceramic type.= I used the type found in TV (type TV18) and used 180 of them (15 sta= ges with 12 rectifiers each one). Each single diode will comfortably stop 20000 volts of opposing voltage. A series of 6 of these diodes will stop 120 Kvol= ts - that's 20 Kvolts more than the maximum value. Admittedly this is working ne= ar to the limit, however not one of the diodes blew-up. In a voltage doubler, there are two diode-systems. Both systems must resist the maximum voltage.<= o:p>

Examining = the condensers in a little more detail there are of course two - an excitor one (right) and also the filter (left). Once finished both will have an external diameter of 110 mm. Each tape has a capacitance with the aluminium pipe of about 10 pF.

As mention= ed before and as seen in the diagram above, both condensers are placed parallel and at a distance of 8= 0 mm. The electrode off the last tape and reaching a value of 1.5 mega volts sits at a height of 1300 mm (9).

The contai= ner is filled with oil (10) - in this case lubricant oil of the type SAE40 so that between the electrode of high tension coming off the last tape and the surf= ace of the oil there exists a distance of more than 700 mm.

It should = be mentioned that transformer oil is good for alternating voltage, however it'= s

not = so good for direct current voltage owning to the electrolytic effect. I used a generic kind found in Argentina with a viscosity of SAE-40.

Lastly, co= nsider the items above these two condensers. We need a way of indicating outcomes for the application of voltages= greater than 1300 Kv.

We then co= nnect to the last tape or condenser a wire that connects to a flat aluminium shee= t. This sheet is horizontal and exists to serve the voltage to the ELECTRIFIED MASS - (EM) (11).

The EM is a piece of bronze of 60 = mm of diameter, spherical and attached to an acrylic bar. This bar is attached= to a horizontal acrylic bar and allows the EM to swing like a pendulum. Attached to the EM is a fine wire = - like a spring. This is screwed to = the bottom of the EM and bends so that it is in contact with a slightly curved aluminium sheet (12) at all times. The result - a 60 mm bronze ball tha= t swings like a pendulum while at all times being in electrical contact with the aluminium sheet. This ball sh= ould therefore at all times be at a voltage with respect to the surrounding environment of ~1.5 MV negative.

The device should be located in such a way that the freedom of movement is perpendicul= ar to the magnetic lines of the Earth – the magnetic field being near to= a value of 1 Gauss (Buenos Aires, Argentina). In summary, the freedom of move= ment should be in an east-west sense. The reason for this positioning will become more obvious a little later. = For the moment however examine Diagram 12.2 depicting the way the apparatus sho= uld be positioned.

<= o:p>

DIAGRAM 12.2

That compl= etes the descriptive overview of the device and its components. We now move to its operation and resulting characteristics when a voltage of such intensity is applied.=

Consider f= irstly the correct outcome of an application of voltage to such a device located within a magnetic field. Inde= ed located such that it can swing perpendicular to a magnetic field. Lenz's law stipulates that, given a rising voltage within a magnetic field (The earth'= s) the apparatus - the EM and the oil around - will move LEFT. This is assuming the observer is standing south of the device. So powering up the device the EM started to move to the left and as expected. However, at the point where the voltage built to just over 1.3 MV something very unusual happened. The EM= (and the oil) reversed direction and started to move to the RIGHT. This is as the reader is well awar= e in complete contradiction to Lenz's law.

This volta= ge continued to be increased to 1.5 MV and stayed there. Now the EM instead of returning ba= ck to the initial position stayed right. There appeared to exist a consistent force being applied to the EM.<= o:p>

The magnet= ic force of the Earth is by nature a weak one. I then bought a magnet from the south in order to invert the magnetic field. The EM then moved left and far more forcefully than before due directly to the fact the magnetic field being brought to bear was much stronger. In fact, the EM slammed against the side of the container with quite= some violence.

The reader= will no doubt be aware that an EM sitting against the side of the container - se= ethe right side of the previous diagram - with both a still voltage and still magnetic field is contrary to the standard doctrines of physics. A force fr= om no-where? Another rule of the electromagnetism that's stopped working?

This test = was repeated several times and time and again the results recovered where identical. I also found that close to the EM there was an area of very low gradients of electric potential. Therefore, this inversion of movement, abr= upt and very strong, is currently not explainable in terms of the physics of the 20-th century.

I was particularly surprised by the circumstances surrounding the movement back to the left by the EM as a direct result of my bring a simple magnet close to = the container and inverting the magnetic field. This was something that would/should not be expected according to 20th century physics laws - especially the fact that the EM stayed left! This indicated the EM was being accelerated to the left and, for me, there was absolutely no re-action appl= ied by the EM upon the magnet within my hand. Clearly, given the fact the EM accelerated to the right should have resulted in an equal and opposite force being applied back on the magnet in my hand.

The EM wei= ghs near 1 kg, however I didn't feel ANY re-action force.= When I moved the magnet away from the EM the EM returned to = the right with the same intensity as before - owing of course to the ever present magnetic field of the Earth.

It was evi= dent that the force applied on the EM was a function of the intensity of the magnetic field and its direct proximity. If a person were to take a magnet = in the hand and move it close to an iron or a coil containing many loops as indicated in a circuit, it would normally feel a reaction force. If in fact= the magnet were to move an object of comparable size and weight as the EM it wo= uld be inconceivable not to feel a reaction. When I moved the magnet close to the container I felt nothing in the way of a reactionary force - nothing. Moving the magnet close to heavy i= ron resulted in a strong attraction and this was of course expected - the trans= gression against Lenz's law wasn't!

Seemingly (although not really) this experiment has broken several of the dogmas of currently accepted physics. Firstly the rule of Lenz and secondly the rule = of electromagnetism according to which, an electric charge is accelerated only= by a varying magnetic field. Moreover what about the action-reaction principle? A principle that represents one of the pillars of modern day physics!

The intere= sting thing here is that it only happens above ~1.3 MV.

The analysis from the Eteronic Theory is quite involved. We need to take into account the position of the Apparatus in relati= on to the Earth and also the Earth's position with regard to the Galaxy. I shall start though with the requirements for movement of the EM and then the orientation of the Galactic Orbital Velocity (GOV). It is referred to the Solar System’s orbit ar= ound the centre of the Galaxy at a speed of 220 km/sec.

Referring = back to Chapter 2 and the result of a current through a coil. The Diagram 12.3 represents the direction of the po= lar rings of planet Earth.

<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> <= o:p>

DIAGRAM 12.3 = &nb= sp; DIAGRAM 12.4

Expanding further the idea of the polar rings that create the magnetic lines of force= the following diagram - Diagram 12.4 - shows in more detail the way polar rings= and lines of the magnetic field surround the globe. Anywhere then on the Earths surface except at the poles and near them polar rings will be effectively oriented in a West-East direction.

<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> <= o:p>

DIAGRAM 12.5 = &nb= sp; DIAGRAM 12.6

Diagram 12= .5 shows the orientation of the Polar Rings surrounding the Earth. Its clear from this that looking n= orth or South if you could you would see the polar rings running across from wes= t to east. This is half of the ana= lysis and provides the orientation of the polar rings. We need to know the orientation of= the Earth (its axis) in relation to its galactic orbit. The Earth is not still in space but moving at a colossal speed of around 220 km/sec in its galactic orbit. In particular we need to know the direction of its Galactic Orbital Velocity (GOV). Introns are generated in the direc= tion of the GOV. This is very impo= rtant in the analysis, as it's the introns that provide the basis of the movement= of the EM.

Given the = two components - the polar ring orientation and the GOV orientation we can posi= tion the EM such that it has an important perpendicular component to the GOV - m= ore on this later.

The Earth'= s axis sits approximately 35 degrees off this orientation. GOV spins 360 degrees i= n 24 hours around Earth’s axis. This means that from a person's point of v= iew on the equator the GOV is 35 degrees off the direct North - South orientati= on (near towards Deneb star). The Diagram 12.6 details the inverted cone that the GOV subscribes over a 24-ho= ur period.

This indic= ates that the GOV appears to wobble doing a single circumference of an inverted = cone over a single day. There is however an important perpendicular component wi= th respect to the polar rings to the GOV. The polar rings surround the globe laterally while the GOV is directed to a large extent parallel to the axis = of the planet but at an angle of 35 degrees to it.

This is the environment that we electrify the EM in. The EM has been set up such that only a= n east west movement is possible.

Again for clarity the polarity of the dipoles of all eterons when looking towards nor= th will be (- +) - that is negative - positive in a West to East direction. The GOV is, from a person's perspective looking North, directly North at the equator. It is effectively perpendicular to the polar rings.

So now the orientation of the GOV, polar rings and the apparatus have been described we can now detail the processes occurring within the Apparatus.

I have, by process of empirical analysis, determined that the threshold of eter-ionisa= tion is very close to 1.3 MV. This= means that at this value of voltage the distortion taking place within the eteron= s is such that they split into two eter-ions, one positive and one negative. This is called eter-ionisation and= 1.3 MV is the practical value for successful separation into the two positive a= nd negative sub-components.

Diagram 12= .8 is a pictorial representation of what occurred in the container housing the experiment. The EM is represented at the centre and is surrounded by positi= ve eter-ions. The electron= ic polarisation of the EM at this point was approximately 1.5 MV (negative). The EM has been depicted swung to = the right.

On its surface, the pot= ential of the EM is 1.5 Mv. At a distance equal to its radius from the surface the potential will have reduced to a value of ~375 Kv. Increasing the distance,= the potential decreases by the power of 2 of that distance. Much nearer than the previously mentioned radius-distance, we can locate the Equipotential Surfa= ce ES (spherical, in the space surrounding the EM) of ~1.3 Mv. It is on this surface that eterons split into two ions, generating an ion-cloud in balance with the voltage. Within the enclosed area of the ES the positive ions move into the interior while the negative ions on the outside of the ES move awa= y. Both polarities are in balance.

As mention= ed previously the magnetic field is a resultant from a polar sheaf field. It is the orientation of dipoles t= hat indicate the direction the eter-ions would be pushed in. So on one side of = the ES (the right side), the positive eter-ions are pushed out from within and towards the equipotential surface meeting the negative eter-ions coming in = from (ostensibly) the other side where they were originally split. The direct re= sult at the ES surface on this side (the right side) is a melding of the two oppositely polarised eter-ions recreating an original neutral eteron. On the opposite side - the left side - neutral eterons are split into their constituent parts (positive eterons as said before going into the EM and the negatives moving away from the apparatus to some huge loop).

The amount= of eterons on both sides will always be equal because the process must always = be in balance. The effect of the field generates an ion-current, a current of eter-ions - or in another way a flow of eter-ions. In fact it can be regard= ed as a sub-electric current. This sub-electric current is flowing such that opposite polarities move in opposite directions. On the side where the eter= on's are splitting, there is a reduction of neutral eterons and a lower eteronic pressure is generated. This "lower pressure" is in the form of lower compressed eterons or eterons that are simply bigger. On the opposite side, neutral eterons are smaller in radius as there are more of then for a given volume of space - e= xtra eterons have been created from the melding of eter-ions. The immediate space is in effect d= enser.

The Equipotential surface is theoretical and is really a three dimensional area with an equipotential equal to or greater than 1.3 MV.

It is this boundary - the ES - that represents the area containing only positive eter-= ions from the space outside containing negative eter-ions. This space also contains eterons of various densities as can be seen from the diagram above.<= /p>

This bound= ary (ES) can be reduced to a question of mathematics. The potential is given by= the formula:

= = E =3D k/r²

= Where E is the potential (in volts)

= r is the distance

= k is a constant.

I refer to= this shell as the "rupture surface".

Referring = back to chapter THE ETERON the reader will remember that neuter or neutral etero= ns are common eterons of the surrounding medium - they are not ionized.

The magnet= ic field is a resultant of the polar sheaf field and is the attractive force t= hat causes polar sheaves to attract. It was explained in chapter 2 (THE POLAR SHEAF). The magnetic field is the force field caused by polar sheaves (a perpendicular attraction); so, polar sheaves are perpendicular to force-vectors. The force-vector field (magnetic field) is perpendicular to = the polar-sheaf-field.

Looking towards north, polar sheave= s go from west to east, with positive ends angled towards the east. It's a little uncomfortable to imagine it especially keeping in mind the rule of Lenz the visualization does become nasty. So, instead of thinking of a "magnetic field", we should instead think of a "polar-sheaf-field" - p= olar sheaves attracting (or repelling) between them and in a perpendicular sense. The force that moves eter-ions then is parallel to the dipoles of the sheav= es.

Returning = to the idea that polar sheaves can transfer their energy to neuter eterons if there are free eter-ions within the space, the sheaves will also move them accord= ing to their charge orientation, transferring energy to them. That is, if a magnetic field finds eter-ions, it generates a "sub-electric current&q= uot; using them and at the same time losing the same energy to the magnetic fiel= d.

<= o:p>

DIAGRAM 12.8

In this wa= y, the polar sheaves, perpendicular to the magnetic field, began to move the posit= ive eter-ions in the EM from left to right (see the diagram 12.8).

This sub-electromotive force produces more eter-ionization at the left side on t= he rupture surface and the flight of positive eter-ions at the right side and = its later union with the negative eter-ions of the surrounding space. Effectively the eterons on the lef= t side are being ionised while on the right side they are joining back with the opposite counterparts to form neuter eterons again.

There are 3 kinds of eteron currents:

1. Neuter eterons that are simply flowing - eterons that are moving. Movement without electric activity= .

2. Eter-io= ns flowing - opposite polarity flowing in opposite directions. This phenomenon= I have named a "sub-electric current" or "sub-electricity"= ;. Both kind of current ignore each other. They may well be superimposed or ex= ist alone.

3. The opp= osed flow of a polar thread, where eterons (with strong dipoles but in this case= not ionised) flow in opposed directions. This third kind interacts strongly with sub-electric currents, but in a different way from the first kind of curren= t.

Generally,= every neuter eteron-flow with regard to some particle or field is equivalent to t= he movement of that particle or field with regard the eterons. So, neutral ete= rons flowing with regard atoms would be the same as atoms moving inside a medium= of neutral eterons.

As mention= ed earlier this produces a sub-electric current from left to right. At the left side a partial vacuum of eterons is created while on the right an area of denser eterons exists. There is actually a density gradient in space from l= eft to right.

Gradient i= s the variation, in mathematic language. Maybe, we can replace "gradient&quo= t; by "variation". But "variation" implies the possibility= of varying the essence of something, while "gradient" is only the variation of intensity (a mathematical value).

By gradien= t I am inferring that it is the differential function of the "field-intensity function". In a simple way the denser zone of eterons means eterons in= a higher energy state.

In this experiment the negative eter-ions move from right to left caused directly by the polar sheaf field of Earth, however this sub-electric circuit is just t= hat, a circuit, and for there to be a movement there needs to be a closed path.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> This path is huge closing the loop= far out to space where the field of Earth is weak, and the sub-electromotive fo= rce circulates from left to right.

Some clari= ty here! "Current" is the concept of some group of determined kind of particles moved inside a conductive medium, like a tube; or the current of a river, the zone of higher speed of the water. It can also be referred to as= a lengthened moving zone contained inside an extensive still zone. "Flow" is the concept of an extensive zone that is moving - all p= arts and with a similar speed.

Both conce= pts become fused when the "current" zone becomes wider.

In this wa= y, the electric current inside a wire is a "current" and the moving of t= he air (the wind) is a "flow". Current is the moving of part of a medium, like a whirlpool current in water; it is water moving inside water. This is in some conflict with the first idea, that of particles inside a tu= be.

Flow is the moving of a medium with regard to another different medium, like water movi= ng within a riverbed. (The previously mentioned conflict again).

For the pu= rposes of this explanation let us merge the two concepts such that flow is equal to current in principle and leave it at that.

It is for = this reason, near the EM, that the negative eter-ions go to the left at the left side and arrived from the right at the right side.

The gradie= nt of density took place because the sub-electromotive force removed energy from = the polar sheaf field and generated eterons at a higher energy state on the rig= ht side of the EM. This, in turn, generated an "eteromotive" force -= a force able to move eterons in a neuter state, from right to left.

Eteromotiv= e is any force that moves eterons. Referring to the 3 kinds of currents the conc= ept can become confused. In this case, I have referred to the "eteromotive" force as that that moves neuter eterons.

Please not= e that for eter-ions, the word "eterionmotive" sounded nasty; the other choice could have been "eter-electromotive", which to me sounded = not much better. Referring to polar sheaves, I preferred to explain the idea ra= ther than invent another new word.

To move et= erons with regard to atoms is the same as to move atoms with regard to eterons. It is relative. The atoms of the E= M, of the oil and even of the surrounding air, they all obtain introns with regar= d to this flow - introns generated from the orbit around the centre of the galax= y. These atoms didn't move at all with regard to the surrounding objects; it w= as the space (the eteronic medium) that was moved with regard to them.

Lets recap= on the apparatus and then introduce the concept of the GOV as it applies.=

The moveme= nt of Earth (and the EM) against the eterons of space generates the introns. This movement is called the Earth's Galactic Orbital Velocity or GOV. The GOV for all intensive purposes travels parallel to the Earth's axis. The eteron current near the EM travels from East to West via deep space. Negative eter-ions move East and away while the positive eter-ions m= ove to the EM and effectively to the other side of the Equipotential surface or ES. The destruction on the le= ft hand side of eterons and construction on the right hand side causes a varia= tion in the density of eterons. Large rather uncompressed eterons on the left or West side and densely packed eterons around the ES on the other or East side.

Introns ex= ist and are aimed in the same direction (the direction of the GOV) for every particle of the Earth. This of course includes the EM. Like = light photons can be refracted if travelling encounters a heavier medium. In fact every wave will move towar= ds a denser conducting medium. By creating an area or volume where the eterons a= re denser than the surrounding medium introns can be refracted. The eteron current increases (or decreases) the density of that medium causing the intron waves to refract.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Introns drive the movement of part= icles. If introns are refracted, this movement must vary. Generating a lower densi= ty at one side and a higher density at the opposite side, introns see a differ= ent medium and change the moving direction towards the denser zone.<= /span>

Given this consider the result of this gradient. When the "dense-eteron cloud&quo= t; is generated, it is effectively another graviton source. Every denser zone generates gravitons because by nature it seeks to expand. This expansion wo= rks with the normal quantum-rules and results in extra gravitons being generated (long gravitons) in a direction that moves away from the cloud's position. = So, the EM "sees" a denser zone. This zone must be continually regenerated due to the graviton-emission. This requires a small energy supp= ly, but it works.

The value = of this eteronic current exists according to the impedance of the materials it crosses. That impedance is proportional to the density of the surrounding eteronic medium; therefore, where there exists a high density of atoms the impedance is much higher than for a vacuum.

Let me exp= lain this step by step:

The ionization o= f the eteronic medium around the EM causes the generation of free eter-ions and t= he polar sheaves move them, generating current.

That curre= nt, by ionization and deionization, in effect moves neuter eterons from one side to other. (Call it "Neuter eteron current")

This neuter eteron current generates a partial vacuum zone on the West side of the apparatus and a denser zone on the right hand side (by a continual cycle of destruction - on the left side - and construction - right side - of eterons).

Between bo= th zones there is a GRADIENT of eteron energy density - A variation of eteron compression density. It is a torsion of the space.

Introns are refracted and their direction of movement is turned towards the denser zone= .

Impedance = here is a concept of resistance. But in this case not just the resistance of a simple resistor. Let us take a coil of say 10 ohms and 1 Henry of inductanc= e. For a direct current, its impedance is 10 ohms. For an alternating current = of 1000 Hz its impedance is:

2.<= span style=3D'mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol'>p.F.L =3D 6283 o= hms.

Where F =3D 1000 Hz (cycles per second) and L =3D = 1 Henry.

If current= and voltage are in phase, the resistance of 10 ohm is added. If not, a more com= plex formula governs the sum to obtain the impedance.

Impedance = is the sum of "kinds of resistances". In this case the eteronic impedanc= e is the resistance of the surrounding eteronic medium to the moving eteronic current - the destruction and subsequent creation of neuter eterons. To mov= e an atom inside the eteronic medium generates introns. To move the eteronic med= ium against atoms also generates introns. The outcome of this is that a force is needed to move eterons within an eteronic medium. If there is an atomic vac= uum (space), the resulting force required to move the current is low; however if the immediate space is full of atoms (air), the current generates introns a= nd the force required is high and removes energy from the source of the force. Atoms brake the current.

So, where = there are atoms, impedance is high. If the impedance is high, the movement of ete= rons from the denser zone is lower, then with the same eteromotive force a denser zone is generated.

The eterom= otive force then is proportional to the average compression level (existence of atoms) of the eterons in the area of high density. In fact the high impedan= ce generated by the presence of dense matter causes a large difference in densities and a resulting low eteronic current instead of an intense flow of eterons with a low-density difference. Densities here are of course densiti= es of eterons.

This high difference of densities (high with regard to what would have been generated= in vacuum, but intrinsically of low value) generates the gradient of density of the eteronic medium.

I talk abo= ut higher and lower density with regard the average density of the eterons. I wrote about a "partial vacuum of eterons" as the lower density zo= ne. There isn't really a vacuum - every hole is filled by eterons, but if etero= ns are compressed, it is simply a higher or denser zone. We can name "nor= mal density" as that of space. Every compressed eteron is in a higher dens= ity state, a higher energy state. So, a cloud of compressed eterons exists with= in a denser zone. A zone that absorbs eterons (because something is removing oth= er eterons from there is in effect a "virtual partial vacuum zone". = It is not really a zone without eterons, but the behaviour is very similar.

It is this= gradient that refracts the introns of the EM and produces a deviation with regard to= the movement of the objects that surround it. This movement as mentioned before= is due to the solar system's common movement with and according to the centre = of the galaxy - the GOV.

Imagine a = photon entering water from air. It's refracted because it enters a denser medium, where the speed of light is lower. An intron's speed is that of light. If it travels through smaller (denser) eterons, its speed is lower and the intron (exactly as a photon) is refracted. Of course, the intron only moves with t= he speed of light inside the area of the particle that generated it. It is born and absorbed in only one cycle. One intron only travels ONE wavelength and dies. But it does it at the speed of light and can be refracted during its = one cycle life. This way, every lonely intron is refracted a very small angle. However every future intron remembers the refraction of the previous one. M= any small angles are thus added together. While the particle is inside the gradient, many intron-cycles occur and due to this a significant angle of refraction accumulates.

Taking thi= s a step further consider a particle as apposed to just one intron. Each partic= le can have only ONE intron at a time. The particle's intron can have just one moving direction and its ali= gned with the galactic orbit. If we were to observe an object moving perpendicul= ar to this galactic orbital direction, there would still only be one movement-vector however it would still be different to the other (still observed) objects. The movement-vector is the sum of two vectors - the orig= inal vector (that of the Earth's galactic orbit) and the added vector. From our Earth observation point of view this added vector is the only moving-vector observable. In reality however the new vector - the one observed - is VERY slightly longer and rotated. If we accelerate an object (like with a rocket= ), the vector becomes longer (the modulus) and energy input is needed.

If however= we only ROTATE the vector, without varying the modulus, no energy input is required. The new vector is different from the Earth's vector and the Earth pulls on = the object via the rod attached to the EM trying to return it to its previous orbit. This pulling brakes the planet and removes kinetic energy FROM the planet transferring it to the object.

As the int= ensity of the gradient is proportional to the intensity of the polar rings and thus the resulting magnetic field, when bringing a strong magnet close to the EM= and effectively inverting the polarity of the field of Earth, the EM hit the internal wall of the container strongly in the opposite direction to the movement originally generated by the Earth's magnetic field. This movement was due to the movement of= the eteronic medium - the eteronic sub-current was inverted due to the polar sheaves also being inverted.

Again at t= he same time, the pressure generated by this area of high density produces a movement of compressed eterons (the eteron current), obeying the quantum la= ws, and escaping as gravitons.

This effec= t can be called VECTOR ROTATION, since it rotates the direction of the speed vect= or of an object, without varying the modulus of that vector.=

The rotati= on of each intron is of a very small angle. A photon that has crossed an area of = the gradient of density would have been refracted only slightly. However as an object doesn't move at the speed of light, the intron flashes practically in the same place, linked to that object.&nbs= p; In each cycle, the movement vector rotates a minimum value, but as t= he frequency of the intron is extremely high, the rotation rises to an importa= nt practical value. It is possible to calculate the rotation as the angular va= lue in one second. It is equal to the angle that a photon would have been refra= cted with the same gradient during one second, multiplied by the quotient between the length of the photon and of the intron.

The speed = of the object is another topic. Basically, in the experiment, this speed was that = of the planet Earth, no longer in its solar orbit, but in its galactic orbit. = The solar system moves in its orbit around the centre of the galaxy at a tangen= tial speed of about 220 km/sec.

That speed implies a kinetic energy, transformed into heat, for an object approaching temperatures of millions of degrees.

The Earth travels around the Sun at a tangential speed of 29.7 km/sec and represents kinetic energy 55 times less than that of the galactic orbital velocity. When discussing rotation here the = its the rotation of the GOV that is assumed.

The speed = of the Earth's galactic orbit is 55 times more significant than the Earth's Sun-orbit-speed component as it orbits the sun. The galactic-orbital-vector (GOV) of the Earth then, wobbles slightly due to the orbital movement of Ea= rth.

A rotation= for introns of angles of about 10 or 20 degrees would generate such enormous sp= eeds that objects experiencing this would burn up in the air and cause really serious accidents. In fact if someone were to research historical experimen= ts using Van de Graff generators producing several million volts they would fi= nd existence of such accidents. In these cases, when generating such intense magnetic fields to deviate the sheaf of ions, the deficient fixing of the electrode of high voltage failed to bear the pressure of the vector-rotating force. Subsequently the electrode came flying out of the device, causing significant destruction. I found this out researching several accidents associated with the history of nuclear exploration.

It is in t= his way that we have access to a colossal energy source. It is truly colossal. = It is the kinetic energy of the whole planet, at 220 km/sec. I call it GEOKINE= TIC ENERGY and I have dedicated the following chapter to it.<= /p>

P.S. A device based on the experiment is patented in Argentina (AR017347B1) <= /o:p>