GRAVITY

GRAVITY<= span lang=3DEN-US style=3D'font-size:14.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size:16.0pt;font-famil= y:"Times New Roman"; color:windowtext;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;font-style:normal;text-decoration: none;text-underline:none'>

<= o:p>

The idea of matter is interlaced with the concept of energy. Moreover, one is equivalent to the= other according to the formula E=3Dmc². Summarizing the previous chapters it was found that waves were made = up of more compressed eterons than the surrounding eteronic medium. The same can = also be said about particles, however the structures of both entities have impor= tant differences. Nevertheless, both entities require compressed Eterons to exis= t. They have a common essence that conceptually is neither matter nor energy. = So to describe this concept I have coined a new word: MATTERGY – created from the words “matter” and “energy”.

Mass is no= w a new concept. The mass of a single eteron depends on its diameter and this w= ill increase with the inverse of its volume. If this appears to be a strange concept, recall the much stranger concept of time stretching with a corresponding increase in mass. The same number of eterons can have differe= nt masses and correspondingly equal masses can be made up of different numbers= of eterons. It all depends on the energy state of eterons. <= /p>

Once these concepts have been clarified, we can begin to see how gravity works.

In the cha= pter on WAVES we saw the simplest type of wave. It was in fact a pressure-wave t= hat travelled through the conducting medium at the speed of light crossing any = kind of medium encountered because it has no strong dipoles. It does not interact electrically with electrons or positrons (This last concept is not exactly true, as will be seen soon.) however a dense medium will refract it (like a photon). The structure of a graviton is almost identical to that of an intr= on. At the very least, the generation of necklaces occurs in an identical way. = The chapter on KINETIC ENERGY described how an intron moves within a particle. = When the intron is reflected by the surrounding medium and it inverts its moving sense against the particle. Its behaviour is similar to the situation where= a graviton passes across a particle, resulting in the imparting of energy to = the particle and a resultant braking of that particle’s movement. More specifically if a graviton hits a particle’s core exactly then it wil= l be as though an intron were being formed by the particle in effect adding move= ment to the particle. From the particle’s viewpoint this graviton passing across it works exactly like an intron and the particle absorbs it totally reemitting it having after the first cycle converted it into a “proper” intron. Of course if an intron already existed owned by the particle then the energy of this graviton is added to the original intr= on. If that original intron’s speed vector had any parallel component with regard to that of the graviton, in fact if both are of equal sense, then th= ey would be added together and the kinetic energy of the particle will have experienced a net increase. If however the components are of opposed senses, they are then subtracted and the graviton is reemitted as a shorter gravito= n. In this case the sum of energies of the graviton and the intron will not change.

DIAGRAM 10.1

Within the previous chapters it was shown that gravitons and introns have necklaces without strong dipoles. Now observe diagram 10.1. The top picture represent= s a cone with strong dipoles. It is this type of cone that exists within electr= ons. The bottom picture represents a cone with weak dipoles. Perhaps the name “weak” is not totally correct here. We should in fact rename the term “weak dipoles” with “surface-dipoles”. These a= re the dipoles that manage barrier-forces between Eterons (refer to diagram 5.= 2). Within a neutron there exist cones with surface dipoles. Being a neutron th= ey must be 1838 times smaller (and therefore with a corresponding higher level= of energy) to ionise an eteron. However, being dipoles and interacting within cones, they generate an opposed flow identical to the cone process within an electron. This process is also valid for a graviton’s necklaces. (Ref= er to diagram 6.4 in the chapter, WAVES). Necklaces are represented without any electric activit= y. Its at this point I shall introduce a topic that until now I have avoided in the interests of synthesizing the basic concepts clearly. Taking the front-half-wave (FHW) of an intron, let us introduce the opposed flow of neighbouring necklaces. Taking adjacent necklaces alternatively, there are = two kinds:

1. &= nbsp; Moving-ahead necklaces (“AN”)

2. &= nbsp; Moving-backwards necklaces (“BN”)

Each “AN” slides between two neighbouring “BN’s It is possible to visualize it as a caterpillar track whose top part is a “AN” and the bottom part on ground is a “BN” actual= ly sliding on the ground backwards. Half of all necklaces are of type “AN” and the other half are of the type “BN”. So, t= he “AN” type are similar to a sheaf of needles moving amongst the another sheaf of needles “BN”. “AN” and “BN” are in fact “interlaced”. The “AN”= is moving ahead at the speed of light determined by the surrounding eteronic medium. “BN” seeks to move backwards also with the speed of lig= ht. However the initial force to start the wave must have determined its moveme= nt vector. So, “BN” is still regarding the medium and “AN= 221; moves ahead at the speed of light. I apologize for the apparent contradicti= on in the chapter on WAVES where I mentioned that eterons do not move but only change their energy state. In that chapter the graviton is presented only a= s a “pressure-wave” as I did not want to complicate the detail of t= he concepts. I am now able to specify this concept with more detail. The ̶= 0;AN’s” are that half of the graviton that is advancing. On the other hand the “BN= 221; could be still necklaces, however they are not totally still. All “AN s’” seek to move ahead, pushing the “BN s’” backward. The “BN s’” then push the medium backwards.

Observe th= at in a photon this phenomenon does not exist because opposed flow is perpendicul= ar to the moving line. So, a photon does not push the conducting medium in any sense but does interact violently with any polar sheaves or cones with stro= ng dipoles it comes into contact with.

Summarizin= g, gravitons do push the conducting medium in an opposed sense to their direct= ion of movement. This phenomenon results in the “space-torsion” experienced around massive bodies like planets and stars. If a graviton fin= ds on its path a particle or a forming intron it will “see” them a= s a denser medium only. It is because the smaller eterons of a particle interact with the graviton with a stronger interaction than with that of the medium.= Due to this “pushing” force being proportional to mass by the energ= y of the graviton. A still particle will be accelerated and said particle will a= s a result generate its own intron. If such a phenomenon occurs to a particle travelling in the opposite direction to the graviton then the accelerated particle instead removes energy from the graviton. After passing, the parti= cle will be moving in an opposed sense to the graviton but only within the RHW = of the graviton. So, the particle removes energy from the graviton. In other words, the sum of energies cannot vary before and after the meeting. If the particle has been accelerated, it must have removed energy from the gravito= n. A back-moving particle sees the graviton as just emitted and its relative spe= ed would be added to the speed of the graviton, beating the speed of light. Instead of this, the graviton actually lengthens. This is valid also for emitted photons. This is the basis of Doppler effect. Notice that I do not = seek to justify the phenomenon with the Doppler effect instead providing the ETE= RONIC-BASIS for the Doppler effect.

Now let us analyze how the gravity of a planet works. There are four cases a particle = and Graviton can meet:

1. A still particle. A Graviton will accelerate the particle in the opposite direction to the grav= iton’s movement that is, downwards giving kinetic energy to the particle

2. Particle falling:

= a. Particle in free fall. The Graviton on encountering and sweeping = the particle will accelerate it increasing its kinetic energy. After completely sweeping the part= icle will emerge being longer.

= b. Particle that is continuously falling. Something acts to stop the particle from being accelerated thus removing the kinetic energy received f= rom Graviton. The sum of speeds of the particle and the graviton would eventual= ly overcome the speed of light and the graviton must leave the particle in a lengthened state. Instead of providing kinetic energy to the particle the graviton instead provides potential energy to the particle.

3. Particle climbing:

= a. The particle is actually free falling but with an initial speed upwards. Given that the gravitons have theirs average speed-vector vertical= and pointing outwards in all these instances are travelling radially out from t= he planet at the speed of light and that it encounters this particle also moving outw= ard the Graviton actually accelerates the particle back towards the planet. It = is thus braking the particle. Kinetic energy of the particle is transferred to= the graviton because in this case the relative particle-graviton speed would be less than the speed of light. The graviton in this case shortens. The gravi= ton travels away from the planet however this time it is shorter (Eterons within the “distortion” that is the wave) having more energy.

= b. Continuous climbing, due to the same relative speed relation as p= oint (a), graviton removes energy from the particle as potential energy.

The last t= hree cases illustrate how gravitons interact with particles managing kinetic and potential energies.

4. The gra= viton is moving perpendicular to the speed vector of a particle. The Graviton in = this case accelerates the particle, creating an intron process that is added to = the already existent intron by vector addition. It was seen in the previous cha= pter (Diagram 9.2). In this case t= he particle will, if travelling horizontal to the planet’s surface, star= t a trajectory downwards towards the surface.

It’s= usual that cases 2 or 3 above are combined with case 4.

Repeating, when a graviton is accelerating a particle already travelling in the opposed direc= tion the graviton came from thus adding kinetic energy to the particle then the result is a shorter intron (of the particle) and a longer graviton. When a = graviton brakes a particle travelling in the same direction of the graviton then the graviton shortens and the particle’s intron lengthens.

The questi= on now arises: where does this source of gravitons come from?

We have se= en in the chapter on PARTICLES how it’s the cones that build the various particles. It was shown that a cone possesses a very complex structure beca= use successively smaller eterons have successively stretched time. The value of “t” is increasing if we move inwards the centre of the particle= . So, there are delays to transfer energy between couples of necklaces of the opp= osed flow. Value of “t” for each Eteron is different and transferring happens like waves traveling = from the particle’s surface towards the centre. This phenomenon does not disturb opposed flow that is managed by higher forces. Such forces are the = sum of lateral propeller-forces of all the eterons of a cone. Exiting eterons h= ave a longer t, they do not expand and climb compressed creating a local hole. = Then entering eterons find that hole without being compressed because exiting on= es did not finish theirs “t” yet. So, for a row of Eterons generat= ed by a few steps (one step =3D surface-eteron’s “t”) there = will be no transfer. The outermost Eteron of the row will be the first of comple= ting “t” and transferring energy and the “transferring wave= 221; begins to travel inwards at a much higher speed than light. It is because n= ow the steps between neighbour Eterons is not “t” of each one but = the difference between both “t”. So, during an interval that can be shorter than “t” a lot of Eterons transfer theirs energy to the entering necklace, generating a hard pressure-front. Such fronts are travel= ling inside the particle’s body with different phases. When phases are add= ed a maximum is created and if it happens at the surface, an eteron (or a group = of them) is thrown out.

In other w= ords, at determined intervals an eteron is released. The expelled eteron is in a higher energy state regarding external medium. The Eteron then via the proc= ess of necklace creation transfers energy to the next causing first a single and then a double necklace and finally forming a long graviton of low energy.

Most of ma= tter in our universe is made up of protons and neutrons and it must exist with a gravity-emission constant: e/m where “e” is energy of gravitons and “m” is the em= itter mass. Such a constant for protons as well as neutrons must be very similar. Electrons would have (if they have) a different value. It is extremely difficult to measure. I expect an electron’s gravity-emission constant would be lower than neutron’s constant. I also suppose that said cons= tant increases if the mass of the emitter particle increases. =

At this po= int, it is necessary to clarify a concept. In an electron, a planet’s grav= ity pulls it with a force 1836 times less that to a proton. It means that elect= rons have so many times less mass than protons. The mass of an electron is proportional to the average compression-state of its eterons. Here an appar= ent contradiction appears. If the internal energy of an electron is due to the “b” state (strong dipole) of its eterons, then such eterons do = not need to be compressed to carry that energy. Nevertheless, extensions made u= p of dipole-bars generate intron. Why? A particle made up of compressed eterons generates intron proportional to the compression of its eterons. Compression-level is the same concept as cohesion-level. A particle carries= its own eterons due to that cohesion. So, it must open a hole in the eteronic medium if it seeks to move. Then, intron is generated by cohesion-forces of= a particle. Also gravitons interact with such mechanism. Internal energy and cohesion are parallel phenomena and one of them can be measured with the ot= her by a constant. In neutral particles, that cohesion is due to surface-dipole= s. In electrons it is due to strong dipoles. Then also electrons have theirs cohesion-forces to build extensions (obvious). Cohesion-forces of dipole-ba= rs also generate intron and they “simulate” to be mass. Well, real= ly IT IS mass.

Then= we can re-define mass: it is something that generates intron and is pulled by gravity. It is also possible to say something that moves slower than light.= So, particles are mass. Waves (graviton, intron, photon) are energy. Compressed space is an intermediate stage between them. Joining concept of all them is “mattergy”.

I apologize again for the previous omission of these concepts. Concept of mas= s is becoming step by step more complex and strange. Remember what Haldane said : “Universe is not stranger than we imagine, but it is stranger than we= CAN imagine.”

However, h= eavier particles than neutrons also have a very short life if they exist within no= rmal space. Measuring the gravity-emission constant under these circumstances is= not impossible, but very near to being such at the moment. Nevertheless, a puls= ar, or something heavier and smaller than a pulsar, possesses a very high press= ure within its body and the gravity-emission constant would be higher in value = than that common particles. This would situate pulsars in a category of bodies t= hat have a short life span directly because they emit such an intense gravity resulting in their level of mass decreasing on such a significant basis. Owing to this process they would s= oon turn into white dwarfs. This hypothesis leads to the possible outcome of a = very low population of pulsars, a very low population of white dwarfs. This is t= he currently observed case within our exploration of the universe.<= /span>

Now, ̶= 0;dark mass” within our galaxy in this case equivalent to10 times more mass = than the observable – that is the total number of observed stars also has = an explanation. Consider a miniature-galaxy, only a few light years in diameter, within the core of ou= r galaxy made up of pulsars and white dwarfs and situated inside a monstrous gas coc= oon making it invisible. It’s been observed that younger galaxies have wi= thin their core an intense light source – quasars. Emitted gravity interac= ts with a relatively thin gas-cocoon absorbing it and as a result generates a = lot of light. Our galaxy is older and as a result those pulsars at its core have already used up their energy emitting gravity. Most of these pulsars have subsequently become white dwarf resulting in a very diminished light-emissi= on. Moreover, the interstellar gas close to this core has become a lot denser as well as shielding most outgoing light. Although the total mass of the core’s pulsars is far less than the total mass of normal stars in our galaxy, the gravity emitting constant is actually very high resulting in an attraction that is 10 times greater that all the rest of the observable sta= rs combined.

<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Our expand= ed idea of the cosmos shows us a new landscape and a new understan= ding as to how our universe and galaxy has been created. Let us suppose that some type of graviton source exists at a given place on the hyperplatform. Gravi= tons radiate from that source and after a very long trip return to back to the s= ame place however from the opposite direction from where they initially started having travelled around the entire hyperplatform. Travelling this course wi= ll see the gravitons arrive at the antipode half way into the journey. This antipode then becomes a matter creation point within the hypersphere.&nbs= p; This matter creation point becomes the “catalyst” for bo= dies that can convert the energy of these gravitons to create low-energy particl= es that, melding together, finish up becoming neutrons. In fact this antipode becomes a neutron source. As we know a neutron lives for 10 minutes and evo= lves into a proton by emitting an electron.&nbs= p; It is really then a hydrogen source. Later over time a hydrogen clou= d is generated and again over time generates giant stars that eventually become pulsars. Smaller stars continue to live further out within the galaxy and t= he process continues.

If we cons= ider this antipode-centre as a meeting zone for gravitons, then there is also a counter force that seeks to repel matter away from that centre. But after meeting and having crossed the centre, gravitons continue moving across the hypersphere. As such the antipode is also a gravity source that attracts ju= st like a planet. The balance between the attractive and repulsion forces at t= his antipode are broken by neutron-creation that reduces the number of crossing gravitons (they go to creating neutrons). As such the repulsion force wins.= As a consequence, just born galaxies always seek to expand and as a result this has resulted in the false hypothesis by eminent physicists that the creatio= n of the universe was caused by the “big-bang”. This antipode, this “galaxy-source” also emits gravity. Its possible that this gravity-source will cause the creation of yet another galaxy at a new antip= ode. As such galaxies are born in this way later to disintegrate back into gravi= ty and again to generate a new galaxy at the other antipode. If this is so, younger galaxies must expand at a lower speed than older ones. If this is t= he case then the red shift of galaxies further away (those that are10 billion light-years away) must display less of a red shift than those of closer galaxies. Astronomical observations confirm this and in fact what this observation is really s= aying is that the galaxy expansion speed is increasing with time. =

The “ingenuous” theory that is the big-bang states that the expansi= on speed must decrease with time – due to the gravitational braking of galaxies. The opposite has been observed and it must be very disconcerting = to those proponents of this false theory.

<= /span> There is another ingenu= ous theory in the world of astronomical physics and that is the concept of black holes. According to this theory, matter is compressed to an infinitesimal s= ize inside the black hole. Intrinsically, I personally consider the idea of “infinitesimal” as an irrational concept. The idea of the “infinite” is NOT a usable concept for understanding our univer= se or being used by any existing thing. If instead we admit to the existence o= f a magnitude that is VERY small (billions of billions of billions… small= er than a neutron, but not null) then a new phenomenon appears, long forgotten= by physicists.

When matter falls into a black hole, as a consequence it must release potential energy.= By approaching the black hole’s core, actual time stretches. As energy is created (from nothing, according to current theory) the black hole’s = mass must increase. So if matter is falling towards its centre, releasing energy behind it, the falling mass adding to the black hole causes mass to increase exponentially. Based on current dogma this mass escalation must end up with huge exponential mass increases over time. Calculating the mass of a black = hole born say 10 billion years ago and assuming it has sucked in mass on an ongo= ing basis would result in a body that emits such gravity that it should have crushed and swallowed all the surrounding galaxies. According current dogma= , a black hole must grow in mass in many magnitude-orders faster than due to gas absorption. Moreover, it needs no more mass than an initial small amount of atoms to grow itself into such a monster. This phenomenon has not been obse= rved (many thanks to God). Moreover, the black hole theory totally contradicts t= he principle that “energy can not be either created or destroyed, but sh= ifts only from one form to another”. It possible that this principle is not “sacred”, however till now no exception as yet been observed. <= o:p>

The above-described absurdity – the current idea of black holes – h= ad its origin in the concept of gravity as a field of mass. Consider then the respective “Fields” of an electron and a positron, which annul if they mee= t. Both these “fields” once annulled convert into kinetic energy a= nd later become a gamma-photon. In contrast then when two masses approach each other the supposed gravity-fields are instead added and potential energy is released. That is, energy is created without the annulling of any other previous form of energy, which as mentioned before contradicts the principl= e of conservation of energy. Said principle is not sacred but till now no exception has been found.

At the mom= ent, all this is about gravity.

<= o:p>

Remember t= hat all text in italic type has been added at the last moment without the supervision of Mr. Simon O’Farrell. I apologize for possible linguist= ic errors.

= &nb= sp; = &nb= sp; The autor.